It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNRDS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRDS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ANF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +14.70% price change this week, while NRDS (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +5.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.92%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.20%.
ANF is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.
NRDS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
@Internet Software/Services (+3.80% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
ANF | NRDS | ANF / NRDS | |
Capitalization | 6.33B | 1.13B | 559% |
EBITDA | 381M | 55.3M | 689% |
Gain YTD | -38.717 | -14.887 | 260% |
P/E Ratio | 21.20 | 828.00 | 3% |
Revenue | 3.85B | 599M | 643% |
Total Cash | 617M | 102M | 605% |
Total Debt | 1.18B | 9.6M | 12,302% |
ANF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ANF | NRDS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 3 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago69% | 17 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANF has been loosely correlated with GAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANF jumps, then GAP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ANF | 100% | +1.95% | ||
GAP - ANF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
BKE - ANF | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
SCVL - ANF | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
URBN - ANF | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
GCO - ANF | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NRDS has been loosely correlated with FVRR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NRDS jumps, then FVRR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NRDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NRDS | 100% | -0.26% | ||
FVRR - NRDS | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
SOFI - NRDS | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
RDDT - NRDS | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
YELP - NRDS | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
Z - NRDS | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
More |