ANF
Price
$84.28
Change
-$1.79 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.82B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URBN
Price
$71.57
Change
-$1.18 (-1.62%)
Updated
Jun 23, 03:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.23B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANF vs URBN

ANF vs URBN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) vs. Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ANF showed modest sales growth but faced margin pressure from higher freight costs and a recent earnings‑beat, while URBN benefitted from easing inflation and a resilient discretionary market.
  • Both stocks trade at forward price‑to‑earnings (P/E) multiples below their industry averages, indicating relative valuation attractivity.
  • ANF’s momentum is mixed: a short‑term price dip after earnings contrasts with a longer‑term uptrend fueled by brand‑strength and expanding international footprint.
  • URBN’s upside stems from its Nuuly rental platform and a favorable macro backdrop, though rising SG&A (selling, general & administrative) expenses remain a risk.
  • Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a slight edge to URBN for stability and near‑term catalyst potential, while still keeping ANF in the watchlist for a possible rebound.

Introduction

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) are two publicly traded specialty apparel retailers that occupy adjacent but distinct market segments. ANF operates the Abercrombie, Hollister and Abercrombie Kids brands, targeting teens and young adults with a blend of casual and classic styles. URBN runs Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People and the Nuuly rental service, catering to millennials and Gen Z shoppers seeking lifestyle‑oriented products. Traders and investors who focus on discretionary retail, brand‑driven growth, and AI‑enhanced trading signals will find this side‑by‑side analysis useful for positioning within a sector that is highly sensitive to consumer sentiment, macro‑economic inputs, and evolving omni‑channel strategies.

ANF Overview and Recent Performance

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. continues to emphasize its omnichannel footprint, with roughly 830 stores worldwide and a strong e‑commerce presence. In recent weeks, the company reported fiscal 2025 fourth‑quarter results that beat consensus revenue expectations, posting net sales of $5.27 billion (a 7 % year‑over‑year increase) and comparable‑sales growth of 1 %. Adjusted earnings per share reached $3.68, and management reaffirmed a fiscal 2026 earnings‑per‑share (EPS) target of $1.20‑$1.30 for Q1 and $10.20‑$11.00 for the full year.

Despite the earnings beat, ANF’s share price slipped roughly 4 % in pre‑market trading following the release, reflecting investor concerns over elevated freight costs and a 360‑basis‑point tariff impact that compressed operating margins to 14.1 % (down from 16.2 % a year earlier). Analyst commentary highlighted a “balanced performance” but noted that upcoming macro risks—particularly higher energy prices and Middle‑East geopolitical tensions—could weigh on inventory costs. The company’s strategic focus remains on opening net‑new stores (approximately 30 in FY 2026) and right‑sizing underperforming locations, which may support top‑line momentum as consumer confidence stabilizes.

URBN Overview and Recent Performance

Urban Outfitters, Inc. operates a portfolio of lifestyle brands and the Nuuly rental platform, positioning itself as a technology‑enabled retailer for younger consumers. In the past month, URBN enjoyed a modest rebound after a brief pullback triggered by concerns over rising gasoline prices that threatened discretionary spending. Easing inflation, lower oil prices and reduced freight costs have helped improve margin outlook, as noted in an early‑April commentary that cited “brightened retail and Nuuly outlook.”

Financially, URBN posted annual sales of $6.17 billion and net income of $464.9 million for fiscal 2026, with guidance indicating mid‑single‑digit revenue growth for the year ahead. The company’s forward P/E ratio sits near 11.8×, well below the specialty‑retail industry average of roughly 19×, suggesting relative undervaluation. Nuuly, the subscription‑based fashion rental service, is scaling with AI‑driven styling tools and is projected to become a significant contributor to recurring revenue. However, rising SG&A expenses tied to store expansion and marketing could offset some of the cost‑benefit gains from lower freight rates.

Trending AI Robots

The Trending AI Robots page on Tickeron showcases a curated selection of the platform’s hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers. While the full library includes bots with diverse strategies—ranging from high‑frequency scalp trades to longer‑term trend following—only those demonstrating consistent performance, low drawdown, and alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in the Trending section. Typical bots exhibit win rates above 55 % and risk‑adjusted returns (Sharpe ratios) exceeding 1.2. Each bot provides transparent statistics such as average daily profit, maximum drawdown, and the specific tickers they target, enabling traders to match a bot’s style with their own risk tolerance and time horizon.

Head-to-Head Comparison

  • Business Model: ANF relies on a dual‑brand strategy (Abercrombie & Hollister) with strong international expansion, whereas URBN leverages a multi‑brand portfolio supplemented by Nuuly’s subscription rental model, giving it a built‑in recurring‑revenue component.
  • Growth Drivers: ANF’s growth is tied to new store openings, brand‑refresh initiatives, and potential acquisition opportunities. URBN’s growth stems from Nuuly adoption, experiential retail concepts, and cost efficiency from lower freight rates.
  • Recent Momentum: ANF posted solid Q4 results but saw a short‑term price dip; URBN experienced a modest rally after macro‑level cost easing and positive retail sales data.
  • Risk Factors: ANF faces margin compression from tariffs, freight costs, and geopolitical supply‑chain disruptions. URBN must manage rising SG&A expenses and the execution risk of scaling Nuuly profitably.
  • Sector Exposure: Both sit in the consumer discretionary apparel segment, yet ANF’s exposure leans more toward traditional brick‑and‑mortar expansion, while URBN is more digitally oriented.
  • Market Sentiment: Analyst consensus gives ANF an “Overweight” rating with a price target of $141, reflecting confidence in brand recovery. URBN carries a “Buy” rating from several boutique firms, citing a 21 % upside potential at current levels.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on the latest observable trends—steady earnings growth at ANF, but a recent price correction, and URBN’s favorable macro backdrop coupled with a high‑growth rental platform—Tickeron’s AI models assign a modest probability advantage to URBN for the near term. The AI weights factors such as forward P/E discount, recent positive catalyst (lower freight costs), and Nuuly’s expanding user base, suggesting URBN may deliver more consistent upside over the next 3‑6 months. ANF remains on the watchlist for a potential rebound if margin pressures ease and new store initiatives accelerate, keeping it relevant for investors seeking longer‑term value.

Disclaimer

“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ANF vs. URBN commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANF is a Hold and URBN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ANF: $86.07 vs. URBN: $72.75)
Brand notoriety: ANF: Notable vs. URBN: Not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANF: 99% vs. URBN: 116%
Market capitalization -- ANF: $3.82B vs. URBN: $6.23B
ANF [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $3.82B. URBN’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $6.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $181.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $10.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileURBN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • URBN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANF is a better buy in the long-term than URBN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while URBN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • URBN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ANF is a better buy in the short-term than URBN.

Price Growth

ANF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -5.52% price change this week, while URBN (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -5.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

ANF is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

URBN is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+0.03% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URBN($6.23B) has a higher market cap than ANF($3.82B). URBN has higher P/E ratio than ANF: URBN (13.99) vs ANF (8.32). URBN YTD gains are higher at: -3.335 vs. ANF (-31.620). ANF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 867M vs. URBN (730M). URBN has more cash in the bank: 696M vs. ANF (619M). URBN has less debt than ANF: URBN (1.23B) vs ANF (1.29B). URBN has higher revenues than ANF: URBN (6.17B) vs ANF (5.28B).
ANFURBNANF / URBN
Capitalization3.82B6.23B61%
EBITDA867M730M119%
Gain YTD-31.620-3.335948%
P/E Ratio8.3213.9959%
Revenue5.28B6.17B86%
Total Cash619M696M89%
Total Debt1.29B1.23B105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANF vs URBN: Fundamental Ratings
ANF
URBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2920
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7529
SMR RATING
1..100
2450
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5027

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANF's Valuation (42) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for URBN (82). This means that ANF’s stock grew somewhat faster than URBN’s over the last 12 months.

URBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANF (75). This means that URBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANF’s over the last 12 months.

ANF's SMR Rating (24) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as URBN (50). This means that ANF’s stock grew similarly to URBN’s over the last 12 months.

URBN's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as ANF (50). This means that URBN’s stock grew similarly to ANF’s over the last 12 months.

ANF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as URBN (52). This means that ANF’s stock grew similarly to URBN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANFURBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URBN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPT64.560.67
+1.05%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Tech ETF
MID67.53-0.05
-0.08%
American Century Mid Cap Gr Impact ETF
XMAY35.99-0.04
-0.11%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-May
EMBX51.34-0.18
-0.36%
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
CSM85.32-0.41
-0.47%
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus

ANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANF has been loosely correlated with URBN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANF jumps, then URBN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANF
1D Price
Change %
ANF100%
-1.34%
URBN - ANF
56%
Loosely correlated
-4.80%
GAP - ANF
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
CAL - ANF
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.58%
DBI - ANF
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
AEO - ANF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More