Advertisement
ANNA vs PED
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANNA is a Hold and PED is a Hold.
PED | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ANNA | PED | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 69% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANNA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PED’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ANNA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PED’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANNA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PED’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ANNA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ANNA (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.35% price change this week, while PED (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
PED is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-0.59% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SCDS | 71.91 | 0.47 | +0.66% |
| JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) | |||
| UPRO | 147.75 | 0.78 | +0.53% |
| ProShares UltraPro S&P500 (UPRO) | |||
| FEIG | 38.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Northern Trust ESG & Climate Investment Grade Corporate Core ETF (FEIG) | |||
| ELM | 29.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM) | |||
| IOCT | 37.63 | -0.14 | -0.37% |
| Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - October (IOCT) | |||
ANNA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANNA has been loosely correlated with PED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANNA jumps, then PED could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANNA | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| PED - ANNA | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| KGEI - ANNA | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| WTI - ANNA | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| VOC - ANNA | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| SM - ANNA | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.79% | ||
More | ||||
PED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PED has been loosely correlated with EOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PED jumps, then EOG could also see price increases.