Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANOAX vs WCMLX
ANOAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ANOAX vs WCMLX
ANOAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANOAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANOAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANOAX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. WCMLX (50M). ANOAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ANOAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ANOAX (24 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than ANOAX (1.38). ANOAX (90.00) and WCMLX (89.00) have comparable annual turnover. ANOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ANOAX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.21 vs. ANOAX (5.63). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.40 vs. ANOAX (-9.67).
| ANOAX | WCMLX | ANOAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.99 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 1.79 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.493 | 7.340 | 184% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.56B | 50M | 11,116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 8.21 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.10 | 27.66 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.67 | -4.40 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement