ANPDF
Price
$13.50
Change
+$2.32 (+20.75%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
34.38B
NCBDF
Price
$36.30
Change
+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANPDF vs NCBDF

Header iconANPDF vs NCBDF Comparison
Open Charts ANPDF vs NCBDFBanner chart's image
Anta Sports Products
Price$13.50
Change+$2.32 (+20.75%)
Volume$1.71K
Capitalization34.38B
Bandai Namco Holdings
Price$36.30
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Volume$111
Capitalization22.39B
ANPDF vs NCBDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCBDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANPDF vs. NCBDF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANPDF is a Hold and NCBDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ANPDF: $13.50 vs. NCBDF: $36.30)
Brand notoriety: ANPDF and NCBDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANPDF: 200% vs. NCBDF: 19%
Market capitalization -- ANPDF: $34.38B vs. NCBDF: $22.39B
ANPDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $34.38B. NCBDF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $22.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $39.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANPDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCBDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ANPDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCBDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ANPDF and NCBDF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANPDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCBDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANPDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NCBDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ANPDF is a better buy in the short-term than NCBDF.

Price Growth

ANPDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NCBDF (@Recreational Products) price change was +0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-1.28% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANPDF($34.4B) has a higher market cap than NCBDF($22.4B). NCBDF has higher P/E ratio than ANPDF: NCBDF (27.03) vs ANPDF (17.85). NCBDF YTD gains are higher at: 71.226 vs. ANPDF (38.462).
ANPDFNCBDFANPDF / NCBDF
Capitalization34.4B22.4B154%
EBITDAN/A238B-
Gain YTD38.46271.22654%
P/E Ratio17.8527.0366%
RevenueN/A1.16T-
Total CashN/A352B-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANPDF vs NCBDF: Fundamental Ratings
ANPDF
NCBDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8989
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7933
SMR RATING
1..100
369
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2615
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANPDF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCBDF (94). This means that ANPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCBDF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANPDF (79). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (36). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (44). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as ANPDF (26). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew similarly to ANPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANPDFNCBDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCBDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRO3.270.03
+0.93%
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Sec Income Fund
KXI65.670.36
+0.55%
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
DTAN29.910.03
+0.10%
Sparkline International IntangibleValETF
THLV29.61-0.07
-0.24%
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
IWM235.17-1.05
-0.44%
iShares Russell 2000 ETF

ANPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANPDF has been loosely correlated with ANPDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANPDF jumps, then ANPDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANPDF
1D Price
Change %
ANPDF100%
N/A
ANPDY - ANPDF
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.74%
LNNGY - ANPDF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
NCBDF - ANPDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDHG - ANPDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.01%
GOLF - ANPDF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More

NCBDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCBDF and NCBDY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCBDF and NCBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCBDF
1D Price
Change %
NCBDF100%
N/A
NCBDY - NCBDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
ANPDF - NCBDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - NCBDF
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
OLCLF - NCBDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNNGY - NCBDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More