Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs CCGEX
ANWFX vs CCGEX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs CCGEX
ANWFX vs CCGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. CCGEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and CCGEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CCGEX (195M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: ANWFX (1.15) vs CCGEX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than CCGEX: ANWFX (18 years) vs CCGEX (19 years). CCGEX (2.25) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: ANWFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. CCGEX (-0.86). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. CCGEX (-4.99).
| ANWFX | CCGEX | ANWFX / CCGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.15 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.25 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.438 | 14.227 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 195M | 87,179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | -0.86 | -897% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 31.04 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | -4.99 | -288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.49 | 19.64 | 563% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers