Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs CCGEX
ANWFX vs CCGEX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs CCGEX
ANWFX vs CCGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. CCGEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and CCGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. CCGEX (205M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than CCGEX: ANWFX (1.15) vs CCGEX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than CCGEX: ANWFX (18 years) vs CCGEX (19 years). CCGEX (2.25) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). CCGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGEX: ANWFX (250) vs CCGEX (2500). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. CCGEX (9.61). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.19 vs. CCGEX (2.51).
| ANWFX | CCGEX | ANWFX / CCGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.15 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.25 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 21.053 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 205M | 83,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | 9.61 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.79 | 45.31 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.19 | 2.51 | 686% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.22 | 33.70 | 375% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers