Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs CCGIX
ANWFX vs CCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs CCGIX
ANWFX vs CCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. CCGIX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a StrongBuy and CCGIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. CCGIX (460M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than CCGIX: ANWFX (1.17) vs CCGIX (0.30). ANWFX was incepted earlier than CCGIX: ANWFX (18 years) vs CCGIX (10 years). CCGIX (0.84) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). ANWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGIX (16.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGIX: ANWFX (250) vs CCGIX (10000). CCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.57 vs. ANWFX (9.09). CCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.52 vs. ANWFX (16.83).
| ANWFX | CCGIX | ANWFX / CCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.80 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.84 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.257 | 9.854 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 460M | 36,087% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.30 | 384% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 15.57 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.03 | 60.66 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.83 | 40.52 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.03 | 198.04 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers