Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs CCGSX
ANWFX vs CCGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs CCGSX
ANWFX vs CCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. CCGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a StrongBuy and CCGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. CCGSX (433M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: ANWFX (1.14) vs CCGSX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than CCGSX: ANWFX (18 years) vs CCGSX (10 years). CCGSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). ANWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (16.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: ANWFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. ANWFX (4.21). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.14 vs. ANWFX (11.78).
| ANWFX | CCGSX | ANWFX / CCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.05 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.720 | 4.263 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 433M | 39,030% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 6.14 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | 49.05 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.78 | 28.14 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.41 | 180.38 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement