Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs CCGSX
ANWFX vs CCGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs CCGSX
ANWFX vs CCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. CCGSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Buy and CCGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CCGSX (446M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: ANWFX (1.17) vs CCGSX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than CCGSX: ANWFX (18 years) vs CCGSX (10 years). CCGSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). ANWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. CCGSX (16.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: ANWFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. ANWFX (6.97). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 33.81 vs. ANWFX (13.41).
| ANWFX | CCGSX | ANWFX / CCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.05 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.040 | 4.408 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 446M | 38,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 12.80 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 42.51 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.41 | 33.81 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.87 | 185.40 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement