Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs CGEOX
ANWFX vs CGEOX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs CGEOX
ANWFX vs CGEOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. CGEOX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and CGEOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. CGEOX (205M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than CGEOX: ANWFX (1.15) vs CGEOX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than CGEOX: ANWFX (18 years) vs CGEOX (6 years). CGEOX (1.20) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). CGEOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). CGEOX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWFX: CGEOX (0) vs ANWFX (250). CGEOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.92 vs. ANWFX (13.64). CGEOX return over 5 years is better than : 23.33 vs. ANWFX (17.19).
| ANWFX | CGEOX | ANWFX / CGEOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.10 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.20 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 21.655 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 205M | 83,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | 17.92 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.79 | 64.34 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.19 | 23.33 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers