Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs FCGIX
ANWFX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs FCGIX
ANWFX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. FCGIX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and FCGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGIX (44M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWFX (1.15) vs FCGIX (0.52). ANWFX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWFX (18 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWFX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. FCGIX (6.47). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. FCGIX (13.12).
| ANWFX | FCGIX | ANWFX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.85 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.37 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.438 | 5.667 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 44M | 386,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.52 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 6.47 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 20.92 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | 13.12 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers