Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs FMSGX
ANWFX vs FMSGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs FMSGX
ANWFX vs FMSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. FMSGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Buy and FMSGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FMSGX (14.9M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than FMSGX: ANWFX (1.17) vs FMSGX (0.93). ANWFX was incepted earlier than FMSGX: ANWFX (18 years) vs FMSGX (7 years). FMSGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). FMSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSGX: ANWFX (250) vs FMSGX (1000000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. FMSGX (3.15). FMSGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.50 vs. ANWFX (13.41).
| ANWFX | FMSGX | ANWFX / FMSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.80 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.13 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.040 | 3.776 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 14.9M | 1,140,940% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.93 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 3.15 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 41.40 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.41 | 35.50 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers