Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs FMSGX
ANWFX vs FMSGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs FMSGX
ANWFX vs FMSGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. FMSGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and FMSGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FMSGX (27.6M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than FMSGX: ANWFX (1.15) vs FMSGX (0.96). ANWFX was incepted earlier than FMSGX: ANWFX (18 years) vs FMSGX (7 years). FMSGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). FMSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMSGX: ANWFX (250) vs FMSGX (1000000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. FMSGX (3.16). FMSGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.29 vs. ANWFX (20.56).
| ANWFX | FMSGX | ANWFX / FMSGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.80 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.13 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.332 | 0.548 | 1,338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 27.6M | 594,203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.96 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.19 | 3.16 | 450% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.34 | 43.47 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.56 | 37.29 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers