Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs HLGZX
ANWFX vs HLGZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs HLGZX
ANWFX vs HLGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. HLGZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and HLGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. HLGZX (535M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than HLGZX: ANWFX (1.15) vs HLGZX (0.58). ANWFX was incepted earlier than HLGZX: ANWFX (18 years) vs HLGZX (9 years). HLGZX (0.79) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: ANWFX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. HLGZX (-6.12). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.19 vs. HLGZX (-34.98).
| ANWFX | HLGZX | ANWFX / HLGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.76 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.79 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 4.299 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 535M | 32,150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.58 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | -6.12 | -223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.79 | -7.81 | -548% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.19 | -34.98 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers