Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs HLMGX
ANWFX vs HLMGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs HLMGX
ANWFX vs HLMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. HLMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and HLMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. HLMGX (532M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: ANWFX (1.15) vs HLMGX (0.25). ANWFX was incepted earlier than HLMGX: ANWFX (18 years) vs HLMGX (30 years). HLMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: ANWFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. HLMGX (-6.65). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.19 vs. HLMGX (-36.24).
| ANWFX | HLMGX | ANWFX / HLMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 4.113 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 532M | 32,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.25 | 451% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | -6.65 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.79 | -9.03 | -474% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.19 | -36.24 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.22 | 8.57 | 1,472% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers