Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs HLMGX
ANWFX vs HLMGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs HLMGX
ANWFX vs HLMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. HLMGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Buy and HLMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. HLMGX (530M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: ANWFX (1.17) vs HLMGX (0.26). ANWFX was incepted earlier than HLMGX: ANWFX (18 years) vs HLMGX (30 years). HLMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: ANWFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. HLMGX (-10.63). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.41 vs. HLMGX (-37.29).
| ANWFX | HLMGX | ANWFX / HLMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.09 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.040 | 4.884 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 530M | 32,075% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.26 | 457% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | -10.63 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | -11.71 | -296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.41 | -37.29 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.87 | 2.52 | 4,278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement