Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs IOGPX
ANWFX vs IOGPX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs IOGPX
ANWFX vs IOGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. IOGPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and IOGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. IOGPX (975M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than IOGPX: ANWFX (1.15) vs IOGPX (0.73). ANWFX was incepted earlier than IOGPX: ANWFX (18 years) vs IOGPX (17 years). IOGPX (1.33) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). IOGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). IOGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWFX: IOGPX (0) vs ANWFX (250). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. IOGPX (-8.29). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.07 vs. IOGPX (-72.58).
| ANWFX | IOGPX | ANWFX / IOGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.21 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.33 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.527 | -12.887 | -35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 975M | 17,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.73 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | -8.29 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.08 | -59.40 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.07 | -72.58 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.93 | -54.24 | -225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement