Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs MGGLX
ANWFX vs MGGLX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs MGGLX
ANWFX vs MGGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. MGGLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and MGGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. MGGLX (3.02B). ANWFX pays higher dividends than MGGLX: ANWFX (1.15) vs MGGLX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than MGGLX: ANWFX (18 years) vs MGGLX (18 years). MGGLX (1.77) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). ANWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MGGLX (11.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGGLX: ANWFX (250) vs MGGLX (1000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. MGGLX (-5.23). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.07 vs. MGGLX (-25.72).
| ANWFX | MGGLX | ANWFX / MGGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.32 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.77 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.527 | 5.840 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 3.02B | 5,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | -5.23 | -200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.08 | 36.09 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.07 | -25.72 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.93 | 121.63 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement