Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs MGKAX
ANWFX vs MGKAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs MGKAX
ANWFX vs MGKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. MGKAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and MGKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGKAX (45.8M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than MGKAX: ANWFX (1.15) vs MGKAX (0.91). ANWFX was incepted earlier than MGKAX: ANWFX (18 years) vs MGKAX (7 years). MGKAX (8.98) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). MGKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGKAX: ANWFX (250) vs MGKAX (1000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. MGKAX (-13.92). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. MGKAX (-18.42).
| ANWFX | MGKAX | ANWFX / MGKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.35 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 8.98 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.438 | 1.528 | 356% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 45.8M | 371,179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | -13.92 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | -4.11 | -860% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | -18.42 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers