Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs MLMAX
ANWFX vs MLMAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs MLMAX
ANWFX vs MLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. MLMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and MLMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLMAX (66M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than MLMAX: ANWFX (1.15) vs MLMAX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than MLMAX: ANWFX (18 years) vs MLMAX (10 years). MLMAX (1.85) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). MLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMAX: ANWFX (250) vs MLMAX (1000). MLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.46 vs. ANWFX (7.68). MLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.57 vs. ANWFX (14.40).
| ANWFX | MLMAX | ANWFX / MLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.35 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.85 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.438 | 6.127 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 66M | 257,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 13.46 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 54.89 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | 41.57 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.49 | 157.85 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers