Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs MLMCX
ANWFX vs MLMCX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs MLMCX
ANWFX vs MLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. MLMCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and MLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLMCX (65M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than MLMCX: ANWFX (1.15) vs MLMCX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than MLMCX: ANWFX (18 years) vs MLMCX (10 years). MLMCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). MLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMCX: ANWFX (250) vs MLMCX (1000). MLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. ANWFX (3.54). MLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.31 vs. ANWFX (10.90).
| ANWFX | MLMCX | ANWFX / MLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.10 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.66 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.189 | 3.339 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 65M | 261,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 6.96 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.55 | 46.81 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.90 | 33.31 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.60 | 132.34 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement