Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs RNGCX
ANWFX vs RNGCX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs RNGCX
ANWFX vs RNGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. RNGCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and RNGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. RNGCX (51.8B). ANWFX pays higher dividends than RNGCX: ANWFX (1.15) vs RNGCX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than RNGCX: ANWFX (18 years) vs RNGCX (24 years). RNGCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). RNGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX (250) and RNGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.03 vs. ANWFX (7.68). RNGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.69 vs. ANWFX (14.40).
| ANWFX | RNGCX | ANWFX / RNGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.05 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.05 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.438 | 16.846 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 51.8B | 328% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 24.03 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 59.45 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | 28.69 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.49 | 129.88 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers