Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs WAGSX
ANWFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs WAGSX
ANWFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Jul 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. WAGSX (12.3M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: ANWFX (1.15) vs WAGSX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: ANWFX (18 years) vs WAGSX (7 years). WAGSX (2.81) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). WAGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: ANWFX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. WAGSX (-4.30). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.37 vs. WAGSX (-19.73).
| ANWFX | WAGSX | ANWFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.36 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 2.81 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.805 | 1.384 | 492% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 12.3M | 1,382,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.42 | -4.30 | -219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 13.28 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.37 | -19.73 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement