Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs WGGSX
ANWFX vs WGGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs WGGSX
ANWFX vs WGGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. WGGSX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and WGGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. WGGSX (12.1M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than WGGSX: ANWFX (1.15) vs WGGSX (0.00). ANWFX was incepted earlier than WGGSX: ANWFX (18 years) vs WGGSX (7 years). WGGSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). WGGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. ANWFX (23.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGGSX: ANWFX (250) vs WGGSX (100000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.54 vs. WGGSX (-6.09). ANWFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.90 vs. WGGSX (-20.89).
| ANWFX | WGGSX | ANWFX / WGGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.96 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.71 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.189 | 0.477 | 669% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 12.1M | 1,404,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | -6.09 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.55 | 13.86 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.90 | -20.89 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement