Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWFX vs ZGFAX
ANWFX vs ZGFAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs ZGFAX
ANWFX vs ZGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. ZGFAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Hold and ZGFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. ZGFAX (350M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than ZGFAX: ANWFX (1.15) vs ZGFAX (0.73). ANWFX was incepted earlier than ZGFAX: ANWFX (18 years) vs ZGFAX (8 years). ZGFAX (0.86) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.51). ANWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ZGFAX (14.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFAX: ANWFX (250) vs ZGFAX (100000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. ZGFAX (-2.78). ZGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.08 vs. ANWFX (14.40).
| ANWFX | ZGFAX | ANWFX / ZGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.86 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.86 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.438 | -1.457 | -373% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 350M | 48,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.73 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | -2.78 | -276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 21.92 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | 19.08 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement