Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs ESGMX
ANWPX vs ESGMX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs ESGMX
ANWPX vs ESGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. ESGMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and ESGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. ESGMX (659M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than ESGMX: ANWPX (0.96) vs ESGMX (0.14). ANWPX was incepted earlier than ESGMX: ANWPX (53 years) vs ESGMX (10 years). ESGMX (1.26) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. ESGMX (21.00). ANWPX (6%) and ESGMX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than ESGMX: ANWPX (250) vs ESGMX (2500). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. ESGMX (2.89). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 13.60 vs. ESGMX (0.99).
| ANWPX | ESGMX | ANWPX / ESGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.20 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.26 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | -0.869 | -615% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 659M | 25,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.14 | 708% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 2.89 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 23.36 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 0.99 | 1,380% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | 115.79 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement