Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCAOX
ANWPX vs FCAOX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCAOX
ANWPX vs FCAOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FCAOX (58M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCAOX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FCAOX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCAOX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCAOX (5 years). FCAOX (1.74) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCAOX (4%) vs FCAOX (4%). FCAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FCAOX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FCAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.03 vs. ANWPX (13.44). FCAOX return over 5 years is better than : 67.90 vs. ANWPX (16.37).
| ANWPX | FCAOX | ANWPX / FCAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.55 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.74 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.458 | 15.237 | 42% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 58M | 296,552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.44 | 40.03 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.01 | 84.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.37 | 67.90 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers