Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCAUX
ANWPX vs FCAUX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCAUX
ANWPX vs FCAUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FCAUX (59.3M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCAUX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FCAUX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCAUX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCAUX (5 years). FCAUX (1.24) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). FCAUX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FCAUX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FCAUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.83 vs. ANWPX (8.49). FCAUX return over 5 years is better than : 67.06 vs. ANWPX (14.40).
| ANWPX | FCAUX | ANWPX / FCAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.05 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.24 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.090 | 14.852 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 59.3M | 290,051% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.49 | 33.83 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.66 | 82.10 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | 67.06 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LBDRX | 23.57 | 0.31 | +1.33% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R | |||
| VWIGX | 37.81 | 0.13 | +0.35% |
| Vanguard International Growth Inv | |||
| CHTRX | 22.42 | 0.04 | +0.18% |
| Invesco Charter A | |||
| PSVKX | 23.07 | -0.10 | -0.43% |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R4 | |||
| WBSNX | 32.92 | -0.17 | -0.51% |
| William Blair Small Cap Growth N | |||