Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$66.61
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.9B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$19.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.55M
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGIX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. FCGIX (44.6M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWPX (0.53) vs FCGIX (0.43). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FCGIX (8 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (7.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. FCGIX (1.29). FCGIX (49.95) and ANWPX (48.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANWPX | FCGIX | ANWPX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.85 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.49 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.245 | 1.809 | 401% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149B | 44.6M | 334,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.43 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.28 | 1.29 | 796% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.23 | 18.14 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.32 | 49.95 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers