Ad is loading...
ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$59.16
Change-$2.45 (-3.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$18.51
Change-$0.48 (-2.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.9M
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGIX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FCGIX (37.9M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWPX (0.58) vs FCGIX (0.44). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FCGIX (8 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (7.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.39 vs. FCGIX (-3.40). FCGIX (72.61) and ANWPX (69.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANWPX | FCGIX | ANWPX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.85 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.49 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.805 | -1.860 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 37.9M | 366,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.44 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.39 | -3.40 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.60 | 4.78 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.24 | 72.61 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...