Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGIX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a StrongBuy and FCGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FCGIX (43M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FCGIX (0.53). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWPX (54 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.04 vs. FCGIX (-1.02). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.02 vs. FCGIX (8.55).
| ANWPX | FCGIX | ANWPX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.85 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.37 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.585 | 4.299 | 153% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 43M | 393,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.53 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.04 | -1.02 | -397% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.12 | 23.64 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.02 | 8.55 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement