Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGIX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FCGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGIX (44M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FCGIX (0.52). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. FCGIX (6.47). ANWPX (13.60) and FCGIX (13.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANWPX | FCGIX | ANWPX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.85 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.37 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | 5.667 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 44M | 386,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.52 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 6.47 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 20.92 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 13.12 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement