Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGIX
ANWPX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FCGIX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGIX (44.2M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWPX (0.98) vs FCGIX (0.53). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCGIX (9 years). FCGIX (1.37) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWPX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). FCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.37 vs. ANWPX (6.80). ANWPX (12.63) and FCGIX (12.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANWPX | FCGIX | ANWPX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.85 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.37 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.943 | 6.448 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 44.2M | 384,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.53 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 8.37 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.92 | 21.95 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.63 | 12.29 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers