Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCGMX
ANWPX vs FCGMX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCGMX
ANWPX vs FCGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCGMX (44.2M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCGMX: ANWPX (0.98) vs FCGMX (0.48). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCGMX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCGMX (3 years). FCGMX (1.35) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). FCGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FCGMX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FCGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. ANWPX (6.80).
| ANWPX | FCGMX | ANWPX / FCGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.84 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.35 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.943 | 6.442 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 44.2M | 384,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.48 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 8.35 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.92 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.63 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement