Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCLZX
ANWPX vs FCLZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCLZX
ANWPX vs FCLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. FCLZX (58.1M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCLZX: ANWPX (0.98) vs FCLZX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCLZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCLZX (5 years). FCLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). FCLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FCLZX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FCLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.73 vs. ANWPX (8.89). FCLZX return over 5 years is better than : 60.95 vs. ANWPX (16.02).
| ANWPX | FCLZX | ANWPX / FCLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.90 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.05 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.129 | 13.885 | 59% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 58.1M | 285,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.89 | 29.73 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.24 | 85.31 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.02 | 60.95 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers