Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCLZX
ANWPX vs FCLZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCLZX
ANWPX vs FCLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FCLZX (58M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCLZX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FCLZX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCLZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCLZX (5 years). FCLZX (1.09) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). FCLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FCLZX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FCLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.95 vs. ANWPX (10.24). FCLZX return over 5 years is better than : 72.36 vs. ANWPX (13.27).
| ANWPX | FCLZX | ANWPX / FCLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.90 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.09 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.433 | 15.754 | 28% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 58M | 296,552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 39.95 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.31 | 88.77 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.27 | 72.36 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement