Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FCLZX
ANWPX vs FCLZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FCLZX
ANWPX vs FCLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FCLZX (59.3M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FCLZX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FCLZX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FCLZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FCLZX (5 years). FCLZX (1.09) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FCLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). FCLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FCLZX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FCLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.07 vs. ANWPX (7.50). FCLZX return over 5 years is better than : 66.83 vs. ANWPX (13.60).
| ANWPX | FCLZX | ANWPX / FCLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.90 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.09 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | 13.818 | 39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 59.3M | 286,678% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 32.07 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 77.87 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 66.83 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement