Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FGEAX
ANWPX vs FGEAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FGEAX
ANWPX vs FGEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FGEAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FGEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FGEAX (189M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FGEAX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FGEAX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FGEAX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FGEAX (28 years). FGEAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FGEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (6%) and FGEAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FGEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FGEAX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FGEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.29 vs. ANWPX (7.50). FGEAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.29 vs. ANWPX (13.60).
| ANWPX | FGEAX | ANWPX / FGEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.30 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.37 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | 13.771 | 39% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 189M | 89,947% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 14.29 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 45.03 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 30.29 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | 89.75 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement