Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWAFX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$70.33
Change+$0.44 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.52B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$36.74
Change+$0.35 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWAFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FWAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FWAFX (3.28B). FWAFX (0.52) and ANWPX (0.51) have matching dividends . ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWAFX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FWAFX (16 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX (6%) and FWAFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWAFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. FWAFX (-2.39). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 41.19 vs. FWAFX (20.74).
| ANWPX | FWAFX | ANWPX / FWAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.98 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.98 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.235 | 6.778 | 195% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 3.28B | 4,753% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.52 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.71 | -2.39 | -489% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.77 | 39.96 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.19 | 20.74 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.63 | 51.75 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement