Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWAFX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$74.53
Change+$0.42 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$39.44
Change+$0.45 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWAFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FWAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWAFX (3.51B). FWAFX (0.49) and ANWPX (0.48) have matching dividends . ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWAFX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FWAFX (17 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX (6%) and FWAFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWAFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.99 vs. FWAFX (0.27). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.83 vs. FWAFX (16.71).
| ANWPX | FWAFX | ANWPX / FWAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.98 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.98 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.997 | 14.407 | 139% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 3.51B | 4,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.49 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.99 | 0.27 | 5,122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.67 | 60.91 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.83 | 16.71 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.96 | 76.46 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement