Ad is loading...
ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWAFX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$61.62
Change+$0.51 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.68B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide A
Price$31.09
Change+$0.10 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWAFX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FWAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FWAFX (2.95B). FWAFX (0.59) and ANWPX (0.58) have matching dividends . ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWAFX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FWAFX (16 years). FWAFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX (6%) and FWAFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWAFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.71 vs. FWAFX (-8.74). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 49.15 vs. FWAFX (24.69).
| ANWPX | FWAFX | ANWPX / FWAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.98 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.98 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.789 | -8.773 | 9% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 2.95B | 4,707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.59 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | -8.74 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.91 | 10.08 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.15 | 24.69 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.18 | 33.75 | 175% |