Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a StrongBuy and FWAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. FWAFX (3.93B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FWAFX (0.30). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWAFX: ANWPX (54 years) vs FWAFX (18 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (6%) and FWAFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWAFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. ANWPX (4.04). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.02 vs. FWAFX (5.75).
| ANWPX | FWAFX | ANWPX / FWAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.06 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.06 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.585 | 15.237 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 3.93B | 4,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.30 | 319% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.04 | 6.33 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.12 | 44.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.02 | 5.75 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.25 | 89.67 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers