Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWAFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FWAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWAFX (3.91B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: ANWPX (0.98) vs FWAFX (0.30). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWAFX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FWAFX (17 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (6%) and FWAFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWAFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. ANWPX (6.80). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 12.63 vs. FWAFX (10.22).
| ANWPX | FWAFX | ANWPX / FWAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.06 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.06 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.943 | 15.152 | 33% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 3.91B | 4,352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.30 | 326% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 10.22 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.92 | 39.60 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.63 | 10.22 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.81 | 88.25 | 121% |