Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWAFX
ANWPX vs FWAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FWAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. FWAFX (4B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWAFX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FWAFX (0.29). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWAFX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FWAFX (17 years). FWAFX (1.06) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FWAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (6%) and FWAFX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FWAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWAFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FWAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.62 vs. ANWPX (13.44). FWAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.11 vs. ANWPX (16.37).
| ANWPX | FWAFX | ANWPX / FWAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.06 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.06 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.458 | 23.589 | 27% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 4B | 4,296% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.29 | 329% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.44 | 28.62 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.01 | 57.08 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.37 | 20.11 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.99 | 115.05 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement