Ad is loading...
ANWPX vs FWCFX
ANWPX vs FWCFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWCFX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$61.11
Change+$1.17 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide C
Price$28.90
Change+$0.40 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
ANWPX vs FWCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWCFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FWCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FWCFX (2.95B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: ANWPX (0.58) vs FWCFX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWCFX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FWCFX (16 years). FWCFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWCFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.32 vs. FWCFX (-12.15). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 47.91 vs. FWCFX (16.76).
| ANWPX | FWCFX | ANWPX / FWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.73 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.73 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.610 | -10.546 | 15% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 2.95B | 4,572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | -12.15 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.66 | 1.57 | 744% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.91 | 16.76 | 286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.50 | 21.79 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...