Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWCFX
ANWPX vs FWCFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWCFX
ANWPX vs FWCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWCFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and FWCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. FWCFX (4.16B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWCFX: ANWPX (0.96) vs FWCFX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWCFX: ANWPX (53 years) vs FWCFX (17 years). FWCFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). FWCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). FWCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWCFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). FWCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. ANWPX (7.50). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 13.60 vs. FWCFX (8.86).
| ANWPX | FWCFX | ANWPX / FWCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.82 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.82 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | 19.841 | 27% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 4.16B | 4,089% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 16.32 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 40.86 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 8.86 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | 82.33 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement