Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLMGX
ANWPX vs HLMGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLMGX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$67.50
Change-$0.81 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$35.35
Change-$0.50 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets555.08M
ANWPX vs HLMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLMGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and HLMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. HLMGX (555M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: ANWPX (0.53) vs HLMGX (0.15). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLMGX: ANWPX (52 years) vs HLMGX (29 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: ANWPX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. HLMGX (-15.50). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 48.42 vs. HLMGX (-7.19).
| ANWPX | HLMGX | ANWPX / HLMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.08 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.678 | 5.021 | 173% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 555M | 27,207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.15 | 355% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | -15.50 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.13 | 14.87 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.42 | -7.19 | -674% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.43 | 8.68 | 892% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement