Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs HLMGX
ANWPX vs HLMGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs HLMGX
ANWPX vs HLMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. HLMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and HLMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. HLMGX (532M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: ANWPX (0.96) vs HLMGX (0.25). ANWPX was incepted earlier than HLMGX: ANWPX (53 years) vs HLMGX (30 years). HLMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: ANWPX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.44 vs. HLMGX (-6.65). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 16.37 vs. HLMGX (-36.24).
| ANWPX | HLMGX | ANWPX / HLMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.09 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.09 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.458 | 4.113 | 157% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 532M | 32,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.25 | 378% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.44 | -6.65 | -202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.01 | -9.03 | -465% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.37 | -36.24 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.99 | 8.57 | 1,458% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement