Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs LSAGX
ANWPX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs LSAGX
ANWPX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. LSAGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. LSAGX (121M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: ANWPX (0.96) vs LSAGX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: ANWPX (53 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). ANWPX (6%) and LSAGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: ANWPX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.49 vs. LSAGX (-2.30). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. LSAGX (10.81).
| ANWPX | LSAGX | ANWPX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.20 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.33 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.090 | -6.159 | -99% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 121M | 142,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.49 | -2.30 | -370% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.66 | 43.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.40 | 10.81 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.90 | 117.89 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement