Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs LSAGX
ANWPX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs LSAGX
ANWPX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. LSAGX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. LSAGX (123M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: ANWPX (0.98) vs LSAGX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: ANWPX (53 years) vs LSAGX (10 years). LSAGX (1.33) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSAGX (12.00). ANWPX (6%) and LSAGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSAGX: ANWPX (250) vs LSAGX (2500). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. LSAGX (-3.37). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 15.05 vs. LSAGX (11.95).
| ANWPX | LSAGX | ANWPX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.20 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.33 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.064 | -4.453 | -204% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 123M | 134,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.62 | -3.37 | -256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | 48.22 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.05 | 11.95 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.34 | 107.46 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement