Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs LSCGX
ANWPX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs LSCGX
ANWPX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. LSCGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. LSCGX (127M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: ANWPX (0.96) vs LSCGX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: ANWPX (53 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: ANWPX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. LSCGX (6.70). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 19.74 vs. LSCGX (16.10).
| ANWPX | LSCGX | ANWPX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.95 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 2.08 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.265 | -1.257 | -578% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 127M | 129,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | 6.70 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.56 | 52.18 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.74 | 16.10 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.32 | 113.14 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers