Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs LSCGX
ANWPX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs LSCGX
ANWPX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. LSCGX commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. LSCGX (120M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: ANWPX (0.98) vs LSCGX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: ANWPX (53 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: ANWPX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. LSCGX (-3.69). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 13.12 vs. LSCGX (5.51).
| ANWPX | LSCGX | ANWPX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.95 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 2.08 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.294 | -6.286 | -116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 120M | 141,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | -3.69 | -231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.01 | 39.79 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.12 | 5.51 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.24 | 90.82 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers