Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs LSCGX
ANWPX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs LSCGX
ANWPX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. LSCGX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. LSCGX (119M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: ANWPX (0.96) vs LSCGX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: ANWPX (54 years) vs LSCGX (10 years). LSCGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. LSCGX (12.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: ANWPX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. LSCGX (-11.41). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.34 vs. LSCGX (7.27).
| ANWPX | LSCGX | ANWPX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.95 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 2.08 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.203 | -6.601 | -94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 119M | 142,017% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.79 | -11.41 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 46.07 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.34 | 7.27 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.44 | 88.29 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement