Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs MGFRX
ANWPX vs MGFRX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs MGFRX
ANWPX vs MGFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. MGFRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and MGFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFRX (141M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than MGFRX: ANWPX (0.96) vs MGFRX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than MGFRX: ANWPX (53 years) vs MGFRX (12 years). MGFRX (1.38) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). MGFRX (24.00) and ANWPX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: MGFRX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. MGFRX (-20.49). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 13.60 vs. MGFRX (-59.19).
| ANWPX | MGFRX | ANWPX / MGFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.38 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | 8.034 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 141M | 120,567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | -20.49 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | -33.13 | -105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | -59.19 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | -38.83 | -282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement