Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs MGFZX
ANWPX vs MGFZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs MGFZX
ANWPX vs MGFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. MGFZX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and MGFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MGFZX (132M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: ANWPX (0.96) vs MGFZX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than MGFZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs MGFZX (12 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). MGFZX (24.00) and ANWPX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: MGFZX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.38 vs. MGFZX (-23.00). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.15 vs. MGFZX (-57.60).
| ANWPX | MGFZX | ANWPX / MGFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.102 | 1.360 | 228% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 132M | 128,788% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | -23.00 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.85 | -30.51 | -104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.15 | -57.60 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.51 | -34.14 | -303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers