Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs MGFZX
ANWPX vs MGFZX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs MGFZX
ANWPX vs MGFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. MGFZX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and MGFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. MGFZX (140M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than MGFZX: ANWPX (0.98) vs MGFZX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than MGFZX: ANWPX (53 years) vs MGFZX (12 years). MGFZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). MGFZX (24.00) and ANWPX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MGFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: MGFZX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. MGFZX (-17.98). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 15.05 vs. MGFZX (-55.28).
| ANWPX | MGFZX | ANWPX / MGFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.93 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.064 | 8.282 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 140M | 118,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.62 | -17.98 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | -23.76 | -185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.05 | -55.28 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.34 | -32.11 | -350% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement