Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs MLMAX
ANWPX vs MLMAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs MLMAX
ANWPX vs MLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. MLMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and MLMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. MLMAX (66M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than MLMAX: ANWPX (0.96) vs MLMAX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than MLMAX: ANWPX (53 years) vs MLMAX (10 years). MLMAX (1.85) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). MLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX initial investment is less costly to investors than MLMAX (5%) vs MLMAX (5%). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLMAX: ANWPX (250) vs MLMAX (1000). MLMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.46 vs. ANWPX (7.50). MLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.57 vs. ANWPX (13.60).
| ANWPX | MLMAX | ANWPX / MLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.35 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.85 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | 6.127 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 110% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 66M | 257,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 13.46 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 54.89 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 41.57 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | 157.85 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement