Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs PGRCX
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs PGRCX
ANWPX vs PGRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. PGRCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and PGRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. PGRCX (938M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than PGRCX: ANWPX (0.96) vs PGRCX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than PGRCX: ANWPX (53 years) vs PGRCX (31 years). PGRCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). ANWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PGRCX (11.23). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRCX: ANWPX (250) vs PGRCX (1000). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. PGRCX (-8.19). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 19.74 vs. PGRCX (-20.13).
| ANWPX | PGRCX | ANWPX / PGRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.91 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.91 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.265 | 3.993 | 182% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 938M | 17,484% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | -8.19 | -171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.56 | -6.31 | -706% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.74 | -20.13 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.32 | 7.20 | 1,617% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers