Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs PRGSX
ANWPX vs PRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs PRGSX
ANWPX vs PRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. PRGSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and PRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. PRGSX (8.31B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: ANWPX (0.98) vs PRGSX (0.13). ANWPX was incepted earlier than PRGSX: ANWPX (53 years) vs PRGSX (31 years). PRGSX (0.81) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: ANWPX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). PRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.44 vs. ANWPX (6.80). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 12.63 vs. PRGSX (11.30).
| ANWPX | PRGSX | ANWPX / PRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.81 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.81 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.943 | 15.192 | 33% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 8.31B | 2,046% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.13 | 761% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 16.44 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.92 | 46.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.63 | 11.30 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.81 | 186.67 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement