Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs PRGSX
ANWPX vs PRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs PRGSX
ANWPX vs PRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. PRGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and PRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. PRGSX (8.68B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than PRGSX: ANWPX (0.96) vs PRGSX (0.12). ANWPX was incepted earlier than PRGSX: ANWPX (53 years) vs PRGSX (31 years). PRGSX (0.81) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). PRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGSX: ANWPX (250) vs PRGSX (2500). PRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.76 vs. ANWPX (7.50). PRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.06 vs. ANWPX (13.60).
| ANWPX | PRGSX | ANWPX / PRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.81 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.81 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | 20.299 | 26% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 8.68B | 1,958% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.12 | 798% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 22.76 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 54.58 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 16.06 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | 205.96 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement