Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs RGPAX
ANWPX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs RGPAX
ANWPX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. RGPAX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. RGPAX (451M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: ANWPX (0.96) vs RGPAX (0.28). ANWPX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: ANWPX (53 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (6%) and RGPAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: ANWPX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. ANWPX (7.54). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.88 vs. ANWPX (14.17).
| ANWPX | RGPAX | ANWPX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.00 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 8.20 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.821 | 2.413 | 241% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 451M | 38,137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.28 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 8.58 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.72 | 47.04 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.17 | 15.88 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement