Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs RNGAX
ANWPX vs RNGAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs RNGAX
ANWPX vs RNGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. RNGAX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and RNGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. RNGAX (48.7B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than RNGAX: ANWPX (0.98) vs RNGAX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than RNGAX: ANWPX (53 years) vs RNGAX (24 years). RNGAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). RNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (250) and RNGAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.69 vs. ANWPX (8.17). RNGAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.39 vs. ANWPX (14.41).
| ANWPX | RNGAX | ANWPX / RNGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.49 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.49 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.455 | 18.229 | 46% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 48.7B | 341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 20.69 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.83 | 58.19 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.41 | 21.39 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.27 | 105.95 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers