Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs RNGFX
ANWPX vs RNGFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs RNGFX
ANWPX vs RNGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. RNGFX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and RNGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. RNGFX (51.4B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than RNGFX: ANWPX (0.96) vs RNGFX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than RNGFX: ANWPX (53 years) vs RNGFX (24 years). ANWPX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RNGFX (0.45). RNGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (250) and RNGFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.31 vs. ANWPX (8.22). RNGFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.53 vs. ANWPX (13.44).
| ANWPX | RNGFX | ANWPX / RNGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.45 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.45 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.773 | 20.294 | 24% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 51.4B | 335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 30.31 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.90 | 75.30 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.44 | 37.53 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.50 | 168.07 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement