Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs RNGFX
ANWPX vs RNGFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs RNGFX
ANWPX vs RNGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. RNGFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Hold and RNGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. RNGFX (50B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than RNGFX: ANWPX (0.96) vs RNGFX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than RNGFX: ANWPX (54 years) vs RNGFX (24 years). ANWPX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RNGFX (0.45). RNGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (250) and RNGFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RNGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. ANWPX (2.76). RNGFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.68 vs. ANWPX (10.13).
| ANWPX | RNGFX | ANWPX / RNGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.45 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.45 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.821 | 16.473 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169B | 50B | 338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.76 | 14.45 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.52 | 66.64 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.13 | 28.68 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.60 | 135.21 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement