Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs SGAAX
ANWPX vs SGAAX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs SGAAX
ANWPX vs SGAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. SGAAX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and SGAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. SGAAX (139M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than SGAAX: ANWPX (0.98) vs SGAAX (0.00). ANWPX was incepted earlier than SGAAX: ANWPX (53 years) vs SGAAX (13 years). SGAAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). SGAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX (6%) and SGAAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGAAX: ANWPX (250) vs SGAAX (2500). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. SGAAX (-15.03). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 14.41 vs. SGAAX (-37.22).
| ANWPX | SGAAX | ANWPX / SGAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.25 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.36 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.455 | -2.389 | -354% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 139M | 119,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | -15.03 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.83 | -17.95 | -233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.41 | -37.22 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.27 | 23.80 | 468% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers