Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs TGBLX
ANWPX vs TGBLX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs TGBLX
ANWPX vs TGBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. TGBLX (32M). ANWPX pays higher dividends than TGBLX: ANWPX (0.96) vs TGBLX (0.54). ANWPX was incepted earlier than TGBLX: ANWPX (53 years) vs TGBLX (5 years). TGBLX (2.07) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). TGBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.20 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGBLX: ANWPX (250) vs TGBLX (500000). TGBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. ANWPX (7.50). TGBLX return over 5 years is better than : 18.54 vs. ANWPX (13.60).
| ANWPX | TGBLX | ANWPX / TGBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.78 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 2.07 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.339 | 10.480 | 51% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 32M | 531,250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.54 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 15.49 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.64 | 30.10 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 18.54 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement