Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs WFGGX
ANWPX vs WFGGX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs WFGGX
ANWPX vs WFGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. WFGGX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and WFGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. WFGGX (1.74B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than WFGGX: ANWPX (0.98) vs WFGGX (0.31). ANWPX was incepted earlier than WFGGX: ANWPX (53 years) vs WFGGX (13 years). WFGGX (1.28) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.71). WFGGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. ANWPX (23.00). ANWPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFGGX: ANWPX (250) vs WFGGX (1000). WFGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.92 vs. ANWPX (8.62). WFGGX return over 5 years is better than : 32.84 vs. ANWPX (15.05).
| ANWPX | WFGGX | ANWPX / WFGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.28 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.28 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.064 | 13.329 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166B | 1.74B | 9,551% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.31 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.62 | 16.92 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.00 | 86.16 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.05 | 32.84 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.34 | 167.71 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement