Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANZAX vs PACIX
ANZAX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts ANZAX vs PACIX
ANZAX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANZAX vs. PACIX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZAX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACIX has more cash in the bank: 1.86B vs. ANZAX (1.71B). PACIX pays higher dividends than ANZAX: PACIX (1.22) vs ANZAX (1.07). ANZAX was incepted earlier than PACIX: ANZAX (16 years) vs PACIX (39 years). PACIX (1.15) is less costly to investors than ANZAX (1.09). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. ANZAX (159.00). PACIX (6%) and ANZAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PACIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANZAX: PACIX (2000) vs ANZAX (2500). PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.01 vs. ANZAX (30.82). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 19.47 vs. ANZAX (14.06).
| ANZAX | PACIX | ANZAX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.08 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.15 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.520 | 23.185 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 1.86B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.22 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.82 | 42.01 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.21 | 67.70 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.06 | 19.47 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.17 | 131.67 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement